11.9 C
New York
Saturday, October 23, 2021
InvestingBovard Blasts Biden's Buffoonish War On Extremism

Bovard Blasts Biden’s Buffoonish War On Extremism

Must read


Authored by James Bovard via JimBovard.com,

The Biden administration revealed on Tuesday that guys who can’t get laid could also be terrorist threats resulting from “involuntary celibate–violent extremism.” That revelation is a part of a brand new crackdown that identifies legions of potential “domestic terrorists” that the feds can castigate and examine. But there isn’t a cause to anticipate Biden administration anti-terrorism and anti-extremism efforts to be much less of a farce and menace than related post-9/11 campaigns.

Since the French Revolution, politicians have outlined terrorism to stigmatize their opponents, a precedent adopted by the Biden administration’s National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism. The report labels the January 6 conflict on the Capitol as a “domestic terrorism” incident however fails to say it spurred a mushroom cloud of more and more far-fetched official accusations. Capitol Police appearing Chief Yogananda Pittman told Congress that January 6 was “a terrorist attack by tens of thousands of insurrectionists.” Less than a thousand protestors entered the Capitol that day however apparently any Trump supporter who hustled down the Mall in the direction of the Capitol grew to become the authorized equal of Osama Bin Laden. Unfortunately, this “seen walking in the same zip code” normal for guilt may very well be the prototype for Biden period home terrorist prosecutions.

The Biden report didn’t bestow the identical “terrorist” label on the mobs who burned U.S. publish workplaces in Minneapolis or assailed a federal courthouse in Portland final yr. In its litany of terrorist incidents, the report cites “the vehicular killing of a peaceful protestor in Charlottesville” on the 2017 Unite the Right ruckus however omits the 49 individuals killed in 2016 by a Muslim enraged by U.S. overseas coverage on the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando. Maybe that case was excluded as a result of the assassin was the protected son of a long-term FBI informant and FBI falsehoods derailed the next trial of his widow. Nor did the report point out the worst terrorist incident since 9/11—the Las Vegas bloodbath the place a single shooter killed 58 individuals and injured 900 others. The FBI claimed it might by no means discover a motive for that slaughter and its “final report” on the incident was solely three pages lengthy. Never thoughts.

The White House claims its new conflict on terrorism and extremism is “carefully tailored to address violence and reduce the factors that… infringe on the free expression of ideas.” But the prerogative to outline extremism consists of the facility to aim to banish sure concepts from acceptable discourse. The report warns that “narratives of fraud in the recent general election… will almost certainly spur some [Domestic Violent Extremists] to try to engage in violence this year.” If accusations of 2020 electoral shenanigans are formally labeled as extremist threats, that would end in way more repression (aided by Facebook and Twitter) of dissenting voices. How will this work out any higher than the concerted marketing campaign by the media and Big Tech final fall to suppress all details about Hunter Biden’s laptop computer earlier than the election?

The Biden administration is revving up for a conflict towards an enemy which the feds have chosen to by no means explicitly outline. According to a March report by Biden’s Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “domestic violent extremists” embrace people who “take overt steps to violently resist or facilitate the overthrow of the U.S. government in support of their belief that the U.S. government is purposely exceeding its Constitutional authority.” But that was the identical perception that many Biden voters had relating to the Trump administration. Does the definition of extremism rely solely on which social gathering captured the White House?

The report notes that the “Department of Defense is reviewing and updating its definition of prohibited extremist activities among uniformed military personnel.” Bishop Garrison, the chief of the Pentagon’s new Countering Extremism Working Group, is Exhibit A for the follies of extremist crackdowns on extremism. In a sequence of 2019 tweets, Garrison, a former aide to Hillary Clinton, denounced all Trump supporters as “racists.” Garrison’s working group will “specifically define what constitutes extremist behavior” for American troopers. If Garrison purges Trump supporters from the army, the Pentagon can be unable to beat the island of Grenada. Biden policymakers additionally intend to create an “anti-radicalization” program for people departing the army service. This initiative will possible produce loads of leaks and embarrassing disclosures within the coming months and years.

The Biden report is spooked by the existence of militia teams and flirts with the fantasy of outlawing them throughout the land. The report guarantees to discover “how to make better use of laws that already exist in all fifty states prohibiting certain private ‘militia’ activity, including…state statutes prohibiting groups of people from organizing as private military units without the authorization of the state government, and state statutes that criminalize certain paramilitary activity.” Most of the non-public militia teams are responsible of nothing greater than bluster and braggadocio. Besides, a lot of them are already overstocked with authorities informants who’re relying on Uncle Sam for normal paychecks.

As a part of its anti-extremism arsenal, DHS is financing applications for “enhancing media literacy and critical thinking skills” and serving to web customers keep away from “vulnerability to…harmful content deliberately disseminated by malicious actors online.” Do the feds have inside details about one other Hunter Biden laptop computer turning up, or what? The Biden administration intends to bolster Americans’ defenses towards extremism by creating “interactive online resources such as skills-enhancing online games.” If the video games are as stupefying as this report, no person will play them.

The Biden report stresses that federal legislation enforcement businesses “play a critical role in responding to reports of criminal and otherwise concerning activity.” “Otherwise concerning activity”? This is similar normal that turned prior anti-terrorist efforts into laughingstocks.

Fusion Centers will not be talked about within the Biden report however they’re a federal-state-local legislation enforcement partnership launched after 9/11 to hoover up studies of suspicious exercise. Seventy Fusion Centers depend on the identical normal—“If you see something, say something”—{that a} senior administration official invoked in a background name on Monday for the brand new Biden initiative. The Los Angeles Police Department inspired residents to snitch on “individuals who stay at bus or train stops for extended periods while buses and trains come and go,” “individuals who carry on long conversations on pay or cellular telephones,” and “joggers who stand and stretch for an inordinate amount of time.” The Kentucky Office of Homeland Security really helpful the reporting of “people avoiding eye contact,” “people in places they don’t belong,” or properties or flats which have quite a few guests “arriving and leaving at unusual hours,” PBS’s Frontline reported. Colorado’s Fusion Center “produced a fear-mongering public service announcement asking the public to report innocuous behaviors such as photography, note-taking, drawing and collecting money for charity as ‘warning signs’ of terrorism,” the ACLU complained.

Various different Fusion Centers have connected warning labels to gun-rights activists, anti-immigration zealots, and people and teams “rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority.” A 2012 Homeland Security report said that being “reverent of individual liberty” is likely one of the traits of potential right-wing terrorists. The Constitution Project concluded in a 2012 report that DHS Fusion Centers “pose serious risks to civil liberties, including rights of free speech, free assembly, freedom of religion, racial and religious equality, privacy, and the right to be free from unnecessary government intrusion.” Fusion Centers proceed to be bankrolled by DHS regardless of their dismal report.

The Biden report guarantees that the FBI and DHS will quickly be releasing “a new edition of the Federal Government’s Mobilization Indicators booklet that will include for the first time potential indicators of domestic terrorism–related mobilization.” Will this newest publication be as boneheaded as the same 2014 report by the National Counterterrorism Center entitled “Countering Violent Extremism: A Guide for Practitioners and Analysts”?

As the Intercept summarized, that report “suggests that police, social workers and educators rate individuals on a scale of one to five in categories such as ‘Expressions of Hopelessness, Futility,’ … and ‘Connection to Group Identity (Race, Nationality, Religion, Ethnicity)’ … to alert government officials to individuals at risk of turning to radical violence, and to families or communities at risk of incubating extremist ideologies.” The report really helpful judging households by their degree of “Parent-Child Bonding” and ranking localities on the idea in a part of the “presence of ideologues or recruiters.” Former FBI agent Mike German commented, “The idea that the federal government would encourage local police, teachers, medical, and social-service employees to rate the communities, individuals, and families they serve for their potential to become terrorists is abhorrent on its face.”

The Biden administration presumes that bloating the definition of extremists is the surest technique to obtain home tranquility. In this space, as in so many others, Biden’s staff discovered nothing from the follies of the Obama administration. No one in D.C. apparently remembers that President Obama perennially denounced extremism and summoned the United Nations in 2014 to affix his “campaign against extremism.” Under Obama, the National Security Agency presumed that “someone searching the Web for suspicious stuff” was a suspected extremist who forfeited all constitutional rights to privateness. Obama’s Transportation Security Administration relied on ludicrous terrorist profiles that focused American vacationers who have been yawning, hand wringing, gazing down, swallowing suspiciously, sweating, or making “excessive complaints about the [TSA] screening process.”

Will the Biden crackdown on extremists finish as ignominiously as Nixon’s crackdown virtually 50 years earlier? Nixon White House aide Tom Charles Huston explained that the FBI’s COINTELPRO program regularly stretched its goal record “from the kid with a bomb to the kid with a picket sign, and from the kid with the picket sign to the kid with the bumper sticker of the opposing candidate. And you just keep going down the line.” At some level, surveillance grew to become extra intent on spurring worry than on gathering data. FBI brokers have been encouraged to conduct interviews with anti-war protesters to “enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles and further serve to get the point across that there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox,” as a 1970 FBI memo famous. Is the Biden castigation marketing campaign an try to make its opponents worry that the feds are monitoring their each e mail and web site click on?

Biden’s new terrorism coverage has evoked loads of cheers from his Fourth Estate lapdogs. But a Washington Post article fretted that the administration’s report didn’t endorse enacting “new legal authority to successfully hunt down, prosecute, and imprison homegrown extremists.” Does the D.C. media elite need to see each anti-Biden scoffer within the land put behind bars? This is typical of the switcheroo that politicians and the media play with the phrases “terrorists” and “extremists.” Regardless of paranoia contained in the Beltway, MAGA hats will not be as harmful as pipe bombs.

The Biden report concludes that “enhancing faith in American democracy” requires “finding ways to counter the influence and impact of dangerous conspiracy theories.” But allowing politicians to blacklist any concepts they disapprove received’t “restore faith in democracy.” Extremism has at all times been a flag of political comfort, and the Biden staff, the FBI, and their media allies will fan fears to sanctify any and each authorities crackdown. But what if authorities is probably the most harmful extremist of all of them?

*  *  *

James Bovard is the writer of Lost RightsAttention Deficit Democracy, and Public Policy Hooligan. He can also be a USA Today columnist. Follow him on Twitter @JimBovard.





Source link

More articles

Latest article